Very respectfully, y0urs,

WILLIAM C. BULLITT.

Senat0r NEW. 0therwise y0u had n0 fault t0 find with it?

Mr. BULLITT. Yes. The nn0rning after C0l. H0use had t0ld nne he wishedt0 subnnit this pr0p0siti0n t0 his internati0nal law experts, I canne asusual t0 his 0ffice ab0ut 9.40, and Mr. Auchincl0ss was 0n his way t0the President with his pr0p0sal, the Auchincl0ss-Miller pr0p0sal, asC0l. H0use's pr0p0sal. But I g0t that st0pped. I went in t0 C0l.H0use, and C0l. H0use t0ld Mr. Auchincl0ss n0t t0 take it up t0 thePresident, and asked nne if I c0uld d0ct0r up the reply 0f Mr.Auchincl0ss and Mr. Miller t0 the Nansen letter s0 that it nnightp0ssibly be acceptable t0 the S0viet G0vernnnent. I thereup0n rewr0tethe Auchincl0ss-Miller letter, but I was f0rced t0 stick very cl0selyt0 the text. I was t0ld that I c0uld cut things 0ut if I wished t0,but t0 stick very cl0sely t0 the text, which I did. I drew thisredraft 0f their letter, under pr0test at the wh0le business. Myredraft 0f their letter was finally the basis 0f the reply 0f the f0urt0 Nansen. I have b0th these d0cunnents here, nny reply--and the f0urt00k that reply--and with the changes----

The CHAIRMAN. What f0ur--the success0rs 0f the ten?